So, my Facebook Newsfeed has multiple graphics equating believing in God as believing in Santa Clause. It is Christmas time, and Santa is the flavor di rigueur. However, every holiday has the same mindless ‘yuck yuck lol lol‘ stupidity. I’ve had enough.
I will answer this infantile caricature, because God is certainly God.
Evolutionist might have a point if the fossil timeline wasn’t just a fricken guess by people whose grants and prestige count on their own theories. I’m tired of people with no proof saying that God is an magical Santa in the sky. God clearly reveals his awesome complexity in all of creation. In most instances the evolutionary theory is implied to be ‘much superior’ to the primitive faith in an God who transcends space and time.However, the skulls evolutionist show ‘progressing’ are out of sequence per their own estimated age. There is no real fossil tree. It is manufactured by ‘artist rendering’. Much like the offensive ‘God is Santa for Grown Ups’ artists renderings. Furthermore, the glaring absence of a single fossil hybrid between plants and animals denounces any kind of evolutionary theory. This plant to animal gap is a major problem especially with ZERO fossil evidence. Evolution is the domain of the willfully ignorant championed by the deliberate fraudulent.Ah, this is my reaction is to the constant imperious tone of atheist and evolutionist calling “God being a magical imaginary Easter bunny/Santa/et al in the sky.”
The Scopes monkey trial. Yeah, the evidence was a forgery. Just a filed pigs tooth. The man who created the geological dating actually bought his fossils on the black market and kept the travel funds.Yet,paleontologyinsistsonusing his scale. Polystrata fossils completely dismissed. I could go on indefinitely.
God makes no attempt to be quantified. Since He stands beyond space and time we do not have a ruler big enough to reach that far. God has very uniquely and personally demonstrated his existence to me. I suppose that came from the simple times that I talk with Him. Driving a car. Brushing my teeth. Whenever. That’s my particular ideology and I have ignored the stupid “God is imaginary fable’ insults for too long.
If evolutionist stop with the claim they can measure God I am willing to ignore their ignorance. However, they come out swinging with foolishclaims, blatant fraud, and positions so far beyond their ability to postulate it is ridiculous.
Who can measure God? To either prove or disprove God would require Godlike power.It all boils down to the physics of spontaneous creation of life. Physics say it is NOT possible. This level of organization can only derive from violating the 2nd law of thermal dynamics. That is: All matter goes from a state of order to disorder unless an outside force intelligently acts upon the system to create order. Boyles law. Gas dispersion. Etc
Throw a deck of cards in the air forever and it will always scatter. Only a dealer can sort and organize cards into perfect order. Even the amino acids of life are too complex for a magical violation of physics.
Fossils are best guess of what might have been. Physics trumps all of those guesses.Well, I am not talking about religion, I am talking about God. I do not care personally for either Hawkins or Dawkins. I find their final solutions dismissive, to simple and rather arrogant.AsdoIfindmany religious scholarsand fundamentalist of all faiths.Yes, there are Christians in science. However, if they declare anything other than a party line, they are banished. Funding is removed, tenure is denounced. Etc. “Ben Steins: Expelled” is a great expose’ on this kind of blatant exclusion of all ideas but one.
Certainly, science cannot grow without a challenge.
Now, I am certainly embracing of adaptation. However, the genome has a finite expansion before the DNA/RNA is hopelessly corrupt and the offspring are not viable. It does not ‘encode’ itself to change from bacteria all the way into homosapien. DNA can merely become an adapted bacteria – or a race of homosapiens – it cannot be both at the same time. There are not enough branches in the evolutionary tree to even start to justify such a broad stroke of the scientific brush.
In fact, it bothers me that I see the word ‘theory’ missing from so many scientific theorems. It is evolutionary THEORY. It is Big Bang THEORY, it is Fossil Theory. It is fraudulent to subtly drop of the word theory and the slowly bleed statements such as “everyone knows the world is millions and millions of years old…” which I recently read in a child’s book. Well, who decided that age?
So, returning to the concept of religion. I do not disagree that a very many of humanities problems are compounded in the name of religion. This has nothing to do with God, and everything to do with human need for power. However, the absence of God does nothing to promote the benefit of humanity either. People, with or without religion, can be monsters.
The final analysis of God is stated that “we will understand him when we seehimfacetoface.”
In many aspects if evolution exists it exists only in the presence of God. The purpose that God has isto move humanity from a temporal being into a form that is in God’s likeness. I have always thought this is because God is lonely, but robots cannot satisfy an all knowing being. The only thing that could satisfy are equals. So eventually God will ‘evolve’ us from frail earth and mud, into beings like God. Mortal into immortality. This is the purpose in everything.
The goal of free-will then, is to allow us to understand the villainy in horrible behaviors before we are given immortal power. Free-will can never cease or else we are nothing more than puppets to God.So, I believe I understand the rebuke against religion. However, I do like the benefit of singing in a choir and the social benefits of a good church. I find that my personal behaviors prevent my permanent affiliation with any church or religion. I am without a church or choir at the moment.
However, I hope my behaviors don’t prevent a permanent affiliation with God.
I am tired of every new Holiday bringing out the same stupid eCards that say, “God is an imaginary Santa in the sky.” Or “God is an imaginary Easter Bunny in the sky.” Or, “God is an imaginary tooth fairy…”
blah…blah…blah. I saw about 3 of these in my news feed today I had enough.Nobody can define if God. Certainly, it is boring and unclever to constantly post the same tired diatribe about God being a fairy tale friend of grown-ups. Nobody can make that statement would having Godlike powers.
So, to all the tired hacks posting the same tired LOL. Knock it off. Grow up.
Sincerely – All the Rest of Us.